IRAP Assessment Readiness

Yellow circular logo with intertwined abstract shapes next to "Business Continuity Management (BCM).
EASMLens external attack surface management platform logo
NSPM network security policy management logo
PhishLens phishing simulation and awareness logo

Our IRAP readiness service prepares cloud, SaaS and technology providers for an IRAP assessment against the Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM), so the assessor spends their time confirming controls rather than discovering gaps. IRAP assessments may only be performed by assessors endorsed by the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD). Security Solution Consultants (SSC) does not perform IRAP assessments. We prepare you for one: scoping, ISM control mapping, gap remediation, evidence packs and liaison with the endorsed assessor you engage.

Symmetrical view down a secure data hall with rows of server racks under cool blue light and a sealed steel mesh cage in the centre, representing a protected government hosting environment
Readiness means every control in scope can be shown working before an endorsed assessor arrives.

IRAP at a glance

QuestionAnswer
Who runs it?ASD, through the Infosec Registered Assessors Program (IRAP), endorses individuals from the private and public sectors to provide security assessments.
Who can assess?Only ASD-endorsed IRAP assessors. They are independent professionals, not ASD employees or contractors.
What can be assessed?ICT systems, cloud services, gateways and GovLink, at SECRET and below.
What do you receive?A security assessment report setting out what was tested and the risks found. IRAP assessors do not accredit, certify, endorse or register systems on behalf of ASD.
Who decides?Your government customer, which decides whether to use the system based on the report and its own risk assessment.
What is the benchmark?The ISM, which ASD updates every quarter, in March, June, September and December. The current release is September 2026.
Is there a certified list?No. ASD’s Cloud Services Certification Program ended on 2 March 2020. Buyers now read IRAP reports and make their own decision.

Choosing your target classification

Australian Government information is classified as OFFICIAL, OFFICIAL: Sensitive, PROTECTED, SECRET or TOP SECRET. Most SaaS and cloud providers selling to Commonwealth agencies aim for PROTECTED: agencies handling PROTECTED information typically ask for an IRAP assessment at that level, and the Hosting Certification Framework requires PROTECTED systems to be hosted with certified providers. ISM controls are marked with the classifications they apply to, so the target level decides which controls are in scope. We help you choose the level your customers need and your service can sustain, rather than the highest one available.

IRAP, the PSPF and the Hosting Certification Framework

Three pieces of Commonwealth policy meet in most IRAP engagements, and they answer different questions.

  • The PSPF. The Protective Security Policy Framework is set by the Department of Home Affairs and reviewed every year. Release 2026, issued on 1 July 2026, added policy on post-quantum cryptography transition planning, training on AI use and bring-your-own-device, and enables future Hosting Certification Framework reforms. It is the policy your government customers must apply.
  • The ISM. ASD’s cyber security framework, and the benchmark an IRAP assessor tests against. Agencies apply it through their own risk management.
  • The Hosting Certification Framework (HCF). Requires sensitive government data, whole-of-government systems and systems classified PROTECTED to be hosted with certified data centre and cloud service providers, at Strategic or Assured level. It looks at ownership, control and supply chain as well as security, and an IRAP report can be used as evidence in an HCF assessment. The framework is being reformed: registrations from new providers have been paused since 3 November 2025, and existing certified providers are not affected.

For most SaaS providers the practical question is where the service is hosted. If you build on a hyperscale cloud or a colocation provider, check its HCF certification level and the regions it covers, and confirm with your government customer whether your own service needs anything more while the reform is under way.

Our IRAP readiness services

  • Scoping and system boundary. The components, data flows, interfaces, administrators and support locations in scope, the target classification, and the split of responsibility with your hosting provider.
  • ISM control mapping. Every applicable control for your target classification mapped to an implementation statement, an owner and evidence, including controls inherited from an IRAP-assessed hosting or platform provider.
  • Gap assessment and remediation. Current state tested against the mapping, gaps ranked by risk and effort, and hands-on help to close them, from Essential Eight hardening and logging to cryptography, personnel security and supply chain.
  • Security documentation. The system security plan and the supporting incident response, continuous monitoring and remediation plans, written to describe what you actually do.
  • Evidence packs. Evidence organised by control, with configuration exports, records and policies, so an assessor can sample quickly.
  • Assessor selection and liaison. Help choosing an endorsed assessor from ASD’s list, agreeing scope and timing, answering queries during the assessment and tracking findings to closure.
  • Staying assessable. Each quarterly ISM release checked against your mapping, so a reassessment is an update rather than a restart.
Still life of a plain buff folder closed with a crimson wax seal beside a brass server key on a dark walnut desk, representing controlled evidence for an IRAP assessment
An evidence pack an assessor can sample quickly shortens the assessment and lowers its cost.

How IRAP readiness runs

  1. Scope. Agree the system boundary, the target classification and the customers driving the requirement.
  2. Map. Build the control mapping for the target classification and identify inherited controls.
  3. Assess gaps. Test the current state against the mapping and agree a prioritised remediation plan.
  4. Remediate. Close gaps with your engineers and write the documentation.
  5. Readiness review. A walk-through that samples evidence the way an assessor would, so surprises surface while there is still time to fix them.
  6. Hand over and support. Your endorsed assessor runs the assessment; we support your team, answer queries and help close any findings.

Plainly: we prepare, we do not assess. IRAP assessments may only be performed by ASD-endorsed IRAP assessors, and SSC provides readiness services only. Our readiness review is not an IRAP assessment and does not produce an IRAP report. Keeping the people who prepare a system separate from the people who assess it also protects the independence of the report your customers will read.

What slows an IRAP assessment down

Assessors charge for time, and most of the time lost in an IRAP assessment is lost to the same few problems. Readiness work is aimed squarely at them:

  • An unclear boundary. Components, integrations or support tools that nobody placed in or out of scope until the assessor asked.
  • Inherited controls with no evidence. Claiming a control from a hosting provider without its report, its scope or the ISM release it was assessed against.
  • Documents that describe intent. A system security plan that says what should happen rather than what does, which the assessor then has to test line by line.
  • Hardening gaps. Essential Eight mitigations such as application control, patching and multi-factor authentication only partly in place.
  • Evidence that cannot be sampled. Screenshots without dates, logs nobody can retrieve, and configurations that changed after the evidence was taken.

IRAP for SaaS providers

SaaS providers are assessed against the same ISM, with a few problems of their own:

  • Inherited controls. A hosting provider’s IRAP report covers its layer, not yours. Read its scope, classification and ISM release before you rely on it.
  • Administrative access and support. Where your administrators and support staff are located, how their access is controlled and logged, and what access exists from offshore.
  • Multi-tenancy. How customer data is separated, and how you demonstrate it.
  • Change between assessments. Frequent releases and a quarterly ISM mean the assessed system and the running system drift apart unless change is controlled and recorded.
  • Existing certifications. If you hold ISO/IEC 27001 or a SOC 2 report, many controls can be reused. We map them to the ISM so evidence is collected once.

Why work with SSC

  • We are clear about our role: readiness, not assessment, so there is no conflict with the assessor you choose.
  • SSC is certified to ISO/IEC 27001 and follows a Secure by Design approach, so we prepare evidence the way we prepare our own.
  • Our consultants work every day with the Essential Eight and the ISM’s hardening guidance. See our Essential Eight assessments.
  • The GRCLens IRAP module holds the ISM catalogue pinned to the release you are assessed against, the control mapping, connector-collected evidence and the findings register, so the work outlasts the assessment.

Related services: security certification and accreditation, Essential Eight compliance assessment, penetration testing, ISO 27001 implementation and cyber security services in Canberra.

Frequently asked questions

No. IRAP assessments may only be performed by ASD-endorsed IRAP assessors, and SSC provides readiness services only. We prepare your system and evidence and work alongside the endorsed assessor you engage.

Scoping the system and target classification, mapping the applicable ISM controls, closing gaps, writing the security documentation and organising evidence by control, so the assessment confirms controls rather than discovering missing ones.

No. IRAP assessors do not accredit, certify, endorse or register systems on behalf of ASD. The assessment produces a report, and each government customer decides whether to use the system based on it and its own risk assessment.

Every quarter, in March, June, September and December. The current release is September 2026, and we check each new release against your control mapping.

The highest classification your government customers will actually put in the service, which for most Commonwealth work is PROTECTED. Aiming higher than customers need adds cost without adding sales.

They answer different questions. IRAP assesses a system's security controls against the ISM, while the HCF certifies data centre and cloud providers on ownership, control, supply chain and security, and an IRAP report can be used as evidence in an HCF assessment. The HCF is being reformed, and new registrations have been paused since 3 November 2025.

Not always. It depends on the agency, the classification of the information and the procurement. For services that will hold PROTECTED information, buyers commonly ask for a recent IRAP assessment.

Many can. We map your existing controls and evidence to the ISM so they are collected once, then focus effort on ISM-specific requirements such as the Essential Eight and the controls for your target classification.

Talk to us about IRAP readiness

Tell us where you are today and what you need to achieve. We will come back with a clear scope, timeline and fixed quote.